<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amscreen Begins BP Store Roll-Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/13656/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/13656</link>
	<description>Digital Out Of Home - Insight, Knowledge and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:44:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/13656/comment-page-1#comment-19208</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=13656#comment-19208</guid>
		<description>Agree with the posts above. The screens look clean and bright, eye-level, head on. What is the deal, Adrian ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with the posts above. The screens look clean and bright, eye-level, head on. What is the deal, Adrian ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard konig</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/13656/comment-page-1#comment-19175</link>
		<dc:creator>richard konig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 15:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=13656#comment-19175</guid>
		<description>Is there nothing good about this network at all?  The article appears to be close to being a rant.  &quot;Boycott&quot;?  &quot;Go away and die&quot;?  Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there nothing good about this network at all?  The article appears to be close to being a rant.  &#8220;Boycott&#8221;?  &#8220;Go away and die&#8221;?  Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Coxon</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/13656/comment-page-1#comment-19166</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Coxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=13656#comment-19166</guid>
		<description>Dear Adrian

I agree with Arthur above and would be very interested if you would expand on how they have go it so wrong, not having seen the initial roll out or content?

Many thanks

Simon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Adrian</p>
<p>I agree with Arthur above and would be very interested if you would expand on how they have go it so wrong, not having seen the initial roll out or content?</p>
<p>Many thanks</p>
<p>Simon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Malcorps</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/13656/comment-page-1#comment-19156</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Malcorps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=13656#comment-19156</guid>
		<description>Dear Adrian,

Appreciating your daily contributions, insights and comments. 
This new UK BP-network is new to me (and many readers, I believe). It would be welcome and informative, if you&#039;d try to explain your doubts (in addition to your opinion). What expert advices have been ignored, which success-factors have not been followed? Thanks upfront.

Arthur Malcorps, Netherlands
PS: On the photograph used in your article, at least the appearence, eye-level and head-on exposure do&#039;nt look too bad to me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Adrian,</p>
<p>Appreciating your daily contributions, insights and comments.<br />
This new UK BP-network is new to me (and many readers, I believe). It would be welcome and informative, if you&#8217;d try to explain your doubts (in addition to your opinion). What expert advices have been ignored, which success-factors have not been followed? Thanks upfront.</p>
<p>Arthur Malcorps, Netherlands<br />
PS: On the photograph used in your article, at least the appearence, eye-level and head-on exposure do&#8217;nt look too bad to me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Briggs</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/13656/comment-page-1#comment-19151</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Briggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=13656#comment-19151</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. Good luck to Amscreen and Digicom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. Good luck to Amscreen and Digicom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

