<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quividi&#8217;s Digital Sex Change Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/8887/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/8887</link>
	<description>Digital Out of Home - Insight, Knowledge and Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Manolo</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/8887/comment-page-1#comment-13986</link>
		<dc:creator>Manolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=8887#comment-13986</guid>
		<description>Oliver - I appreciate the fact you took time to comments. However, Its important to reiterate that the basis of the posting was derived from a specific comment from someone representing your product - when I asked why I, a male, filipino was being recognized as a female, I was told that the system was not calibrated for &quot;asian faces.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver &#8211; I appreciate the fact you took time to comments. However, Its important to reiterate that the basis of the posting was derived from a specific comment from someone representing your product &#8211; when I asked why I, a male, filipino was being recognized as a female, I was told that the system was not calibrated for &#8220;asian faces.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Duizabo</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/8887/comment-page-1#comment-13982</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Duizabo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=8887#comment-13982</guid>
		<description>Quividi would like to address the technical aspect of this post.

Quividi&#039;s gender recognition algorithm has a success rate in excess of 86%, as openly stated in our website and in our documentation. What this means is that, on average, one person out of ten will be either misclassified or not classified at all. We absolutely want to stress that any classification errors do NOT depend on ethnicity. As a matter of fact, these errors are not easy to trace back to simple facial features since the algorithm does not work the same way a human brain would. (In passing, note that humans score &quot;only&quot; 95% on gender classification tests!)

The 86% success rate is achieved via a training procedure on a database of over ten thousand manually labeled faces. The face database has been built as to include the largest possible distribution of age brackets, ethnic types and hairstyles and has no &quot;racial&quot; bias. We sell our product all over the world and we need consistent success rates. At the same time, we have never developed nor will ever develop any ethnicity classification mechanism in our software -- that would simply be out of line with Quividi&#039;s core values.

You should remark that, as opposed to our competitors, we are the only audience measurement company to show gender results in real time in our demo. We can afford to do this because we are very confident about our software and because we have always been completely transparent about the capabilities of our product. Normally the occasional and unavoidable mistake is more of a source of chuckles than of a serious critique and we are sorry that this was not the case. Don&#039;t take it personally and do not feel too special: you are just one in ten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quividi would like to address the technical aspect of this post.</p>
<p>Quividi&#8217;s gender recognition algorithm has a success rate in excess of 86%, as openly stated in our website and in our documentation. What this means is that, on average, one person out of ten will be either misclassified or not classified at all. We absolutely want to stress that any classification errors do NOT depend on ethnicity. As a matter of fact, these errors are not easy to trace back to simple facial features since the algorithm does not work the same way a human brain would. (In passing, note that humans score &#8220;only&#8221; 95% on gender classification tests!)</p>
<p>The 86% success rate is achieved via a training procedure on a database of over ten thousand manually labeled faces. The face database has been built as to include the largest possible distribution of age brackets, ethnic types and hairstyles and has no &#8220;racial&#8221; bias. We sell our product all over the world and we need consistent success rates. At the same time, we have never developed nor will ever develop any ethnicity classification mechanism in our software &#8212; that would simply be out of line with Quividi&#8217;s core values.</p>
<p>You should remark that, as opposed to our competitors, we are the only audience measurement company to show gender results in real time in our demo. We can afford to do this because we are very confident about our software and because we have always been completely transparent about the capabilities of our product. Normally the occasional and unavoidable mistake is more of a source of chuckles than of a serious critique and we are sorry that this was not the case. Don&#8217;t take it personally and do not feel too special: you are just one in ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roi</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/8887/comment-page-1#comment-13782</link>
		<dc:creator>Roi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=8887#comment-13782</guid>
		<description>Dear Dennis
Many thanks for your reply. If you have more information about other audience measurement systems I´ll apreciate to comment it with you.
I comment about TruMedia´s solutions because I test some systems and from my point of view it´s important know all the audience (as sure as possible).
If you have a comparison of systems I´ll love to meet you. My cuestion on this post is because I´m curious to know the benefits of other audience measurement systems.
In Spain we have very few cases of audience measurement in place.
Best,

Roi Iglesias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dennis<br />
Many thanks for your reply. If you have more information about other audience measurement systems I´ll apreciate to comment it with you.<br />
I comment about TruMedia´s solutions because I test some systems and from my point of view it´s important know all the audience (as sure as possible).<br />
If you have a comparison of systems I´ll love to meet you. My cuestion on this post is because I´m curious to know the benefits of other audience measurement systems.<br />
In Spain we have very few cases of audience measurement in place.<br />
Best,</p>
<p>Roi Iglesias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/8887/comment-page-1#comment-13774</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=8887#comment-13774</guid>
		<description>Dear Roi,

I think it&#039;s good to be honest and explain that you have a partner with Tru-Media. So, you don&#039;t try to give a comment as an objective opinion, if before you don&#039;t explain the reality.

Dennis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Roi,</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s good to be honest and explain that you have a partner with Tru-Media. So, you don&#8217;t try to give a comment as an objective opinion, if before you don&#8217;t explain the reality.</p>
<p>Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roi</title>
		<link>http://www.dailydooh.com/archives/8887/comment-page-1#comment-13772</link>
		<dc:creator>Roi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailydooh.com/?p=8887#comment-13772</guid>
		<description>¿All systems detect viewers at 125º angle vision?
TruMedia do it, it´s important to know the real audience.

Roi Iglesias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>¿All systems detect viewers at 125º angle vision?<br />
TruMedia do it, it´s important to know the real audience.</p>
<p>Roi Iglesias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
